Though suspended DIG Sanjiv Bhatt has been bailed out in the case of threatening his junior and making him sign a false affidavit, there is more trouble ahead for him as the CID (Crime) have found some financial bunglings by him during one of his earlier tenure. These financial irregularities, estimated to the tune of `20 crore, pertain to Bhatt's posting in State Civil Defence Department from 2006 to 2010. Bhatt is also facing charges of a custodial death in Jamnagar district, dating back to October 1990. DIG Bhatt, who had alleged earlier this year that Chief Minister Narendra Modi had asked the State police to remain inactive when “Hindus vent their anger“ following the killing of 58 kar sevaks in the Sabarmati Express inferno at Godhra on Feb 27, 2002, was arrested on Sept 30 for threatening his former subordinate Karansinh Pant and forcing him to sign affidavit implicating Modi. After spending 17 days in judicial custody in the Sabarmati Central Jail, Bhatt was granted conditional bail by a local court on Oct 17. Departmental enquiries by the State Home Department, completed recently, have revealed financial irregularities of `20 crore in the purchase of sirens to be installed in various district and taluka headquarters. During his tenure in the state Civil Defence department, Bhatt had awarded the contract to instal the sirens to a South India-based company which was blacklisted by the Union Government. A purchase committee set up by the department had rejected the blacklisted company but still the same company was awarded the contract for the project to install nearly 500 sirens in taluka and district headquarters of the State. The inquiry has found that Bhatt’s senior in Civil Defence department Additional DGP RMS Brar, now retired too is involved in the financial irregularity in awarding the contract of the project to instal the sirens. The Civil Defence Department gets 75 per cent of its funding from the Centre but it did not pay its share since the contract was given to the Bangalore-based company blacklisted by the Centre. Thus, the entire cost of `20 crore had to be borne by the State Government, the departmental inquiry revealed. The Home Department is likely to lodge a criminal complaint soon against Bhatt and Brar. Meanwhile, Bhatt has been issued another summons by a local court for filing wrong information to avoid earlier summons. Bhatt had avoided appearing before the police for investigation on September 30 in the Karansinh Pant complaint case on the pretext of appearing before the NanavatiMehta Commission probing the 2002 Godhra train infero and the riots thereafter. Police investigations proved that Bhatt did not appear before the Commission on that day and thus he had provided wrong information to the local court. Bhatt was any way arrested on September 30 evening. |
No comments:
Post a Comment